<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 820 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760221</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, determining that they were not obligated to pay service tax for services rendered to SEZ units. The Tribunal concluded that the Appellant qualified for exemption under the relevant notifications, and the SEZ Act superseded other laws, thus setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 09:14:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=773991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 820 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760221</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, determining that they were not obligated to pay service tax for services rendered to SEZ units. The Tribunal concluded that the Appellant qualified for exemption under the relevant notifications, and the SEZ Act superseded other laws, thus setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>