<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 828 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI-LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760229</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging rejection of a resolution plan for late submission. The appellant argued no specific time was prescribed, claiming submission was possible before 12:00 PM. The tribunal held that the Request for Resolution Plan clearly specified 17:00 hours as the deadline. When the submission date was extended from 27.05.2023 to 03.06.2023, the time remained unchanged. The appellant attempted submission after 17:00 hours on 03.06.2023, taking an unjustified risk. The Committee of Creditors had already considered timely submissions and approved liquidation. No relief was granted due to non-compliance with prescribed timelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 09:14:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=773983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 828 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI-LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760229</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging rejection of a resolution plan for late submission. The appellant argued no specific time was prescribed, claiming submission was possible before 12:00 PM. The tribunal held that the Request for Resolution Plan clearly specified 17:00 hours as the deadline. When the submission date was extended from 27.05.2023 to 03.06.2023, the time remained unchanged. The appellant attempted submission after 17:00 hours on 03.06.2023, taking an unjustified risk. The Committee of Creditors had already considered timely submissions and approved liquidation. No relief was granted due to non-compliance with prescribed timelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>