<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 835 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760236</link>
    <description>NCLAT reduced penalty imposed on battery manufacturer from 4% to 2% of turnover in cartel case. Court found appellant was small player with 2% market share suffering losses, unlike co-violator who had profits in later years. Both companies violated Competition Act through product supply agreements with dominant player. While penalty was reduced considering appellant&#039;s insignificant market position and losses in dry cell battery business, NCLAT refused to waive interest on penalty amount despite appeal&#039;s pendency since 2019, stating appeal pendency cannot justify interest waiver.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 18:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=773976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 835 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760236</link>
      <description>NCLAT reduced penalty imposed on battery manufacturer from 4% to 2% of turnover in cartel case. Court found appellant was small player with 2% market share suffering losses, unlike co-violator who had profits in later years. Both companies violated Competition Act through product supply agreements with dominant player. While penalty was reduced considering appellant&#039;s insignificant market position and losses in dry cell battery business, NCLAT refused to waive interest on penalty amount despite appeal&#039;s pendency since 2019, stating appeal pendency cannot justify interest waiver.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>