<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 840 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760241</link>
    <description>The tribunal concluded that the rejection of the declared value under Rule 12 of the Customs Valuation Rules, based solely on NIDB data, was unjustified and unsustainable. The tribunal set aside the decision to uphold the rejection, allowing the appeal with consequential benefits. It emphasized the necessity of providing valid reasons and evidence to reject declared values, highlighting the inadmissibility of relying solely on NIDB data for valuation purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 15:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=773971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 840 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760241</link>
      <description>The tribunal concluded that the rejection of the declared value under Rule 12 of the Customs Valuation Rules, based solely on NIDB data, was unjustified and unsustainable. The tribunal set aside the decision to uphold the rejection, allowing the appeal with consequential benefits. It emphasized the necessity of providing valid reasons and evidence to reject declared values, highlighting the inadmissibility of relying solely on NIDB data for valuation purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>