<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 841 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760242</link>
    <description>CESTAT Hyderabad allowed appeal by remand in a classification dispute regarding imported roasted cashew kernels. The case involved whether goods should be classified under Customs Tariff Item 20081910 or 08013210, affecting exemption eligibility under Notification 96/2008-CUS. The tribunal found violation of natural justice principles as the appellant was denied access to test reports and opportunity to cross-examine CEPCI representatives whose testing formed the basis for classification denial. The Original Authority failed to adequately examine appellant&#039;s submissions regarding mild dry roasting process, buyer specifications, and certifications from reputed testing agencies. Matter remanded with directions to provide document copies and allow cross-examination of CEPCI representatives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 09:14:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=773970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 841 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760242</link>
      <description>CESTAT Hyderabad allowed appeal by remand in a classification dispute regarding imported roasted cashew kernels. The case involved whether goods should be classified under Customs Tariff Item 20081910 or 08013210, affecting exemption eligibility under Notification 96/2008-CUS. The tribunal found violation of natural justice principles as the appellant was denied access to test reports and opportunity to cross-examine CEPCI representatives whose testing formed the basis for classification denial. The Original Authority failed to adequately examine appellant&#039;s submissions regarding mild dry roasting process, buyer specifications, and certifications from reputed testing agencies. Matter remanded with directions to provide document copies and allow cross-examination of CEPCI representatives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>