<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (8) TMI 34 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38850</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the levy of penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on a partnership firm despite its voluntary disclosure of concealed income amounting to Rs. 6 lakhs. The Court ruled that voluntary disclosure does not automatically absolve the assessee from penalties, which are imposed based on statutory provisions. The firm&#039;s request for minimal penalties or deferral was considered an acknowledgment of liability. The Court rejected the firm&#039;s argument that the disclosed sum was not actual income, affirming the justification for penalties. The department was awarded costs of Rs. 200.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:56:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (8) TMI 34 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38850</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the levy of penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on a partnership firm despite its voluntary disclosure of concealed income amounting to Rs. 6 lakhs. The Court ruled that voluntary disclosure does not automatically absolve the assessee from penalties, which are imposed based on statutory provisions. The firm&#039;s request for minimal penalties or deferral was considered an acknowledgment of liability. The Court rejected the firm&#039;s argument that the disclosed sum was not actual income, affirming the justification for penalties. The department was awarded costs of Rs. 200.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>