<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 868 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760269</link>
    <description>The HC upheld ITAT&#039;s decision allowing the assessee&#039;s loss claim in plastic division despite revenue&#039;s argument that no actual business existed due to absence of finished goods stock. Revenue contended the assessee followed mercantile accounting requiring accrual basis recognition. The HC emphasized tax levy concerns real income with certainty aspects, citing SC precedent in Excel Industries. The settlement agreement executed post-balance sheet acknowledged contract disintegration and assessee&#039;s loss of full transaction value rights. Applying Accounting Standards AS-4 and AS-9 for post-balance sheet contingencies, the HC found no manifest error in ITAT&#039;s favorable ruling for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 10:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=773943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 868 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760269</link>
      <description>The HC upheld ITAT&#039;s decision allowing the assessee&#039;s loss claim in plastic division despite revenue&#039;s argument that no actual business existed due to absence of finished goods stock. Revenue contended the assessee followed mercantile accounting requiring accrual basis recognition. The HC emphasized tax levy concerns real income with certainty aspects, citing SC precedent in Excel Industries. The settlement agreement executed post-balance sheet acknowledged contract disintegration and assessee&#039;s loss of full transaction value rights. Applying Accounting Standards AS-4 and AS-9 for post-balance sheet contingencies, the HC found no manifest error in ITAT&#039;s favorable ruling for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>