<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 813 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760214</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the appellant is eligible for Cenvat credit on invoices with the job worker&#039;s address, as the goods were used for manufacturing by the principal manufacturer. The Tribunal remanded the issue of input receipt and use verification to the adjudicating authority. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed Cenvat credit on courier services based on a prior decision, partially allowing the appeal. The decision was pronounced on 16.10.2024.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 09:13:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=773924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 813 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760214</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the appellant is eligible for Cenvat credit on invoices with the job worker&#039;s address, as the goods were used for manufacturing by the principal manufacturer. The Tribunal remanded the issue of input receipt and use verification to the adjudicating authority. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed Cenvat credit on courier services based on a prior decision, partially allowing the appeal. The decision was pronounced on 16.10.2024.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>