<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (12) TMI 52 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38845</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras declined to answer the questions referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, stating that the reference itself was incompetent due to the lack of grievance on the part of the assessee after the rectification was made. The court highlighted the partner&#039;s statement of no objection as a crucial factor in deeming the subsequent appeals and the reference as incompetent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:42:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (12) TMI 52 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38845</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras declined to answer the questions referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, stating that the reference itself was incompetent due to the lack of grievance on the part of the assessee after the rectification was made. The court highlighted the partner&#039;s statement of no objection as a crucial factor in deeming the subsequent appeals and the reference as incompetent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>