<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 788 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760189</link>
    <description>The Madras HC considered whether bail granted under GST-related proceedings could be cancelled for alleged non-compliance with arrest safeguards. It found that the authorities had recorded reasons to believe, issued summons for appearance, informed the grounds of arrest, and that the respondent had not cooperated with the investigation, had avoided summons, and had tried to leave the country. On those facts, the Court held that the GST summons process and arrest procedure satisfied the procedural safeguards relied on by the respondent, and there was no procedural defect in the arrest or subsequent remand. Bail was therefore liable to be cancelled and the petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 17:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=773890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 788 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760189</link>
      <description>The Madras HC considered whether bail granted under GST-related proceedings could be cancelled for alleged non-compliance with arrest safeguards. It found that the authorities had recorded reasons to believe, issued summons for appearance, informed the grounds of arrest, and that the respondent had not cooperated with the investigation, had avoided summons, and had tried to leave the country. On those facts, the Court held that the GST summons process and arrest procedure satisfied the procedural safeguards relied on by the respondent, and there was no procedural defect in the arrest or subsequent remand. Bail was therefore liable to be cancelled and the petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>