https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760187 The Tribunal's dismissal of the claim for extension of the Non-Functional Financial Upgradation Scheme to Group-B officers was unsustainable because it rejected the application without adjudicating the entitlement issue on merits. Its reasoning was limited to the fact that the benefit had been extended to Group-A officers and that any extension to other categories lay within government domain, without examining the claimant's submissions or recording a reasoned finding. The Delhi HC quashed the order and remitted the matter to the Tribunal for fresh decision in accordance with law after hearing all parties. en-us Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Oct 2024 11:11:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760187 The Tribunal's dismissal of the claim for extension of the Non-Functional Financial Upgradation Scheme to Group-B officers was unsustainable because it rejected the application without adjudicating the entitlement issue on merits. Its reasoning was limited to the fact that the benefit had been extended to Group-A officers and that any extension to other categories lay within government domain, without examining the claimant's submissions or recording a reasoned finding. The Delhi HC quashed the order and remitted the matter to the Tribunal for fresh decision in accordance with law after hearing all parties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760187