https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760185 A tribunal deciding a claim for extension of the Non-Functional Financial Upgradation Scheme was required to examine the request on merits and record a reasoned finding. The tribunal had rejected the OA only because the scheme had already been extended to Group-A officers and further extension was said to lie within the Government's domain, without addressing the association's substantive contentions or the prayer made. The Delhi High Court held that such disposal was unsustainable, quashed the order, and remitted the OA for fresh adjudication in accordance with law. en-us Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Oct 2024 11:11:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760185 A tribunal deciding a claim for extension of the Non-Functional Financial Upgradation Scheme was required to examine the request on merits and record a reasoned finding. The tribunal had rejected the OA only because the scheme had already been extended to Group-A officers and further extension was said to lie within the Government's domain, without addressing the association's substantive contentions or the prayer made. The Delhi High Court held that such disposal was unsustainable, quashed the order, and remitted the OA for fresh adjudication in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760185