<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 785 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760186</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s dismissal of an OA seeking extension of the Non-Functional Financial Upgradation Scheme to Group-B officers was unsustainable because the claim was not examined on merits. A tribunal must consider the contentions raised, adjudicate the entitlement claimed, and record a finding one way or the other rather than refusing relief on the broad view that further extension lay within Government policy. The impugned order was quashed and the OA remitted for fresh decision after hearing all concerned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 11:11:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=773886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 785 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760186</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s dismissal of an OA seeking extension of the Non-Functional Financial Upgradation Scheme to Group-B officers was unsustainable because the claim was not examined on merits. A tribunal must consider the contentions raised, adjudicate the entitlement claimed, and record a finding one way or the other rather than refusing relief on the broad view that further extension lay within Government policy. The impugned order was quashed and the OA remitted for fresh decision after hearing all concerned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>