https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458248 The HC allowed the appeal and set aside the acquittal order passed by the Appellate Court. The case involved dishonour of cheque under Section 138 of the N.I. Act. The Trial Court had convicted the accused, but the Appellate Court acquitted on grounds that the complaint should have been filed in the name of the proprietary concern represented by its proprietor. The HC held this reasoning erroneous, finding no defect in the complaint. The accused failed to rebut the presumption under Section 139 despite examining himself and producing documents. The HC restored the Trial Court's conviction order. en-us Mon, 05 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Oct 2024 20:13:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458248 The HC allowed the appeal and set aside the acquittal order passed by the Appellate Court. The case involved dishonour of cheque under Section 138 of the N.I. Act. The Trial Court had convicted the accused, but the Appellate Court acquitted on grounds that the complaint should have been filed in the name of the proprietary concern represented by its proprietor. The HC held this reasoning erroneous, finding no defect in the complaint. The accused failed to rebut the presumption under Section 139 despite examining himself and producing documents. The HC restored the Trial Court's conviction order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458248