https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458252 An appeal against refusal of leave and rejection of the plaint was maintainable because the order was treated as a rejection of plaint and, in substance, as an appealable decree under the civil procedure framework. The civil suit was barred once the secured creditor had invoked enforcement measures under the securitisation statute, because disputes over the creditor's entitlement, the assignment relied on, and the validity of action under the statute fell within the Debts Recovery Tribunal's jurisdiction. Declarations and injunctions seeking to restrain such action could not be pursued in civil court, and the impugned order was therefore not interfered with. en-us Fri, 13 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Oct 2024 20:13:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458252 An appeal against refusal of leave and rejection of the plaint was maintainable because the order was treated as a rejection of plaint and, in substance, as an appealable decree under the civil procedure framework. The civil suit was barred once the secured creditor had invoked enforcement measures under the securitisation statute, because disputes over the creditor's entitlement, the assignment relied on, and the validity of action under the statute fell within the Debts Recovery Tribunal's jurisdiction. Declarations and injunctions seeking to restrain such action could not be pursued in civil court, and the impugned order was therefore not interfered with. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458252