<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1480 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458267</link>
    <description>ITAT Raipur dismissed revenue&#039;s appeal challenging CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of income addition based on 8% gross receipts estimation. During survey u/s 133A, assessee surrendered income at 8% of turnover but later provided complete books of accounts with supporting documents to AO. AO summarily rejected books citing manipulation without proper examination. ITAT held that confessional statements without supporting material cannot be basis for addition, following SC precedent in S Kader Khan Son case and CBDT circulars. CIT(A) correctly deleted addition as AO&#039;s rejection was based on preconceived notions rather than proper examination of submitted documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 16:43:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=773854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1480 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458267</link>
      <description>ITAT Raipur dismissed revenue&#039;s appeal challenging CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of income addition based on 8% gross receipts estimation. During survey u/s 133A, assessee surrendered income at 8% of turnover but later provided complete books of accounts with supporting documents to AO. AO summarily rejected books citing manipulation without proper examination. ITAT held that confessional statements without supporting material cannot be basis for addition, following SC precedent in S Kader Khan Son case and CBDT circulars. CIT(A) correctly deleted addition as AO&#039;s rejection was based on preconceived notions rather than proper examination of submitted documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>