<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 729 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458244</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals from both Revenue and the assessee, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s orders. It upheld the allowance of sales promotion expenses, emphasizing commercial expediency and consistency, as similar expenses were previously allowed. The Tribunal also upheld the deduction under Section 80IA, agreeing that leasing does not constitute a transfer, thus not violating statutory conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 17:02:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=773778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 729 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458244</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals from both Revenue and the assessee, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s orders. It upheld the allowance of sales promotion expenses, emphasizing commercial expediency and consistency, as similar expenses were previously allowed. The Tribunal also upheld the deduction under Section 80IA, agreeing that leasing does not constitute a transfer, thus not violating statutory conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>