https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760182 HC declined to entertain writ petition challenging Order-in-Original dated 22.05.2024 against a Chartered Accountant despite acknowledging violation of natural justice principles. Court distinguished between maintainability and entertainability, emphasizing that availability of statutory appeal remedy under Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017 must be exhausted first. Following SC precedent in PHR Invent Educational Society case, HC directed petitioner to pursue statutory appeal remedy. Petition disposed without costs, with time spent in writ proceedings excluded from limitation period for filing appeal. en-us Mon, 09 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jun 2025 14:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760182 HC declined to entertain writ petition challenging Order-in-Original dated 22.05.2024 against a Chartered Accountant despite acknowledging violation of natural justice principles. Court distinguished between maintainability and entertainability, emphasizing that availability of statutory appeal remedy under Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017 must be exhausted first. Following SC precedent in PHR Invent Educational Society case, HC directed petitioner to pursue statutory appeal remedy. Petition disposed without costs, with time spent in writ proceedings excluded from limitation period for filing appeal. Case-Laws GST Mon, 09 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760182