<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 780 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760181</link>
    <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioner challenging GST refund rejection. The court set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matter for reconsideration, finding procedural irregularities in the refund application rejection. The decision emphasized the need for proper evaluation of submissions and providing fair hearing before denying tax refund claims under Section 54 of CGST Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 17:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=773641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 780 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760181</link>
      <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioner challenging GST refund rejection. The court set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matter for reconsideration, finding procedural irregularities in the refund application rejection. The decision emphasized the need for proper evaluation of submissions and providing fair hearing before denying tax refund claims under Section 54 of CGST Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>