<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (7) TMI 34 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38817</link>
    <description>For registration of a firm, the partnership deed must disclose the partners&#039; profit and loss shares with sufficient certainty, but the shares need not be set out in a rigid arithmetical form if they can be worked out from the instrument as a whole. Read as a whole, clause 16 was treated as adequately specifying the major partners&#039; loss-sharing, so registration could not be refused on that ground. An omission to fill column 6 of the registration schedule was treated as a technical defect, since the deed was annexed and the profits had been divided in accordance with it; such an immaterial defect could not defeat registration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 12:09:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (7) TMI 34 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38817</link>
      <description>For registration of a firm, the partnership deed must disclose the partners&#039; profit and loss shares with sufficient certainty, but the shares need not be set out in a rigid arithmetical form if they can be worked out from the instrument as a whole. Read as a whole, clause 16 was treated as adequately specifying the major partners&#039; loss-sharing, so registration could not be refused on that ground. An omission to fill column 6 of the registration schedule was treated as a technical defect, since the deed was annexed and the profits had been divided in accordance with it; such an immaterial defect could not defeat registration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>