<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 718 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760119</link>
    <description>The Calcutta HC admitted the petitioner&#039;s revisional application, granting a stay on criminal proceedings under Section 138/141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, citing the NCLT&#039;s insolvency order under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Court held that proceedings are stayed under Section 96 of the Code. The arrest warrant was stayed for five weeks post-vacation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 12:48:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=773579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 718 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760119</link>
      <description>The Calcutta HC admitted the petitioner&#039;s revisional application, granting a stay on criminal proceedings under Section 138/141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, citing the NCLT&#039;s insolvency order under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Court held that proceedings are stayed under Section 96 of the Code. The arrest warrant was stayed for five weeks post-vacation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>