https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760125 NCLAT condoned delay in filing appeal where appellant filed appeal on 02.03.2024 against order dated 22.11.2023. Court held that limitation commenced from 25.01.2024 when liquidator communicated the order via email, not from date of pronouncement since order was not pronounced in open court. Relying on SC precedent in Sanjay Pandurang Kalate case, tribunal found sufficient cause existed for 7-day delay beyond 30-day limitation period. Appeal was filed within condonable timeframe and delay condonation application was allowed. en-us Tue, 28 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Oct 2024 17:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760125 NCLAT condoned delay in filing appeal where appellant filed appeal on 02.03.2024 against order dated 22.11.2023. Court held that limitation commenced from 25.01.2024 when liquidator communicated the order via email, not from date of pronouncement since order was not pronounced in open court. Relying on SC precedent in Sanjay Pandurang Kalate case, tribunal found sufficient cause existed for 7-day delay beyond 30-day limitation period. Appeal was filed within condonable timeframe and delay condonation application was allowed. Case-Laws IBC Tue, 28 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760125