<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 743 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760144</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chennai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions made for unexplained cash credits/loan transactions. The assessee successfully discharged the onus by establishing lender identity, creditworthiness, and transaction genuineness through banking channels, TDS deductions, lender confirmations, and complete documentation. The AO rejected claims without cogent reasons, conducted no independent enquiries under section 133(6), and failed to investigate during assessment or remand proceedings. Once the assessee provided requisite documents, the onus shifted to the AO to controvert the evidence. The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 09:24:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=773554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 743 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760144</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chennai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions made for unexplained cash credits/loan transactions. The assessee successfully discharged the onus by establishing lender identity, creditworthiness, and transaction genuineness through banking channels, TDS deductions, lender confirmations, and complete documentation. The AO rejected claims without cogent reasons, conducted no independent enquiries under section 133(6), and failed to investigate during assessment or remand proceedings. Once the assessee provided requisite documents, the onus shifted to the AO to controvert the evidence. The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>