<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 749 - GUJRAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760150</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the ITAT&#039;s order that no addition was required for the opening stock, as doing so would lead to double taxation. The ITAT concluded that the closing stock from the previous year should be treated as the opening stock for the current year, ensuring a tax-neutral outcome. The HC found no substantial questions of law in the Tribunal&#039;s decision, underscoring the necessity of preventing double taxation in stock valuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 18:24:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=773548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 749 - GUJRAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760150</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the ITAT&#039;s order that no addition was required for the opening stock, as doing so would lead to double taxation. The ITAT concluded that the closing stock from the previous year should be treated as the opening stock for the current year, ensuring a tax-neutral outcome. The HC found no substantial questions of law in the Tribunal&#039;s decision, underscoring the necessity of preventing double taxation in stock valuation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>