<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1525 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458231</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the appeal, remanding the matter to the Assessing Officer. The appellant was permitted to submit evidence proving the amount was received before April 1, 2011. The court instructed the Assessing Officer to verify the loan&#039;s authenticity if received between April 1, 2012, and March 1, 2013. No questions of law were addressed, and no costs were imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 20:43:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=773517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1525 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458231</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the appeal, remanding the matter to the Assessing Officer. The appellant was permitted to submit evidence proving the amount was received before April 1, 2011. The court instructed the Assessing Officer to verify the loan&#039;s authenticity if received between April 1, 2012, and March 1, 2013. No questions of law were addressed, and no costs were imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>