<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (10) TMI 22 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38795</link>
    <description>A company&#039;s payment to an intermediary can fall within deemed dividend rules if, on the facts, the intermediary is only a conduit for the shareholder&#039;s borrowing. Section 2(6A)(e) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 covers not only direct loans to a shareholder, but also payments made on behalf of a shareholder or for the shareholder&#039;s individual benefit. Here, the shareholder&#039;s admissions and the surrounding circumstances showed that funds were borrowed through the intermediary and passed on to him, so the company&#039;s advance was treated as made for his individual benefit and was assessable as dividend in his hands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 11:07:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (10) TMI 22 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38795</link>
      <description>A company&#039;s payment to an intermediary can fall within deemed dividend rules if, on the facts, the intermediary is only a conduit for the shareholder&#039;s borrowing. Section 2(6A)(e) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 covers not only direct loans to a shareholder, but also payments made on behalf of a shareholder or for the shareholder&#039;s individual benefit. Here, the shareholder&#039;s admissions and the surrounding circumstances showed that funds were borrowed through the intermediary and passed on to him, so the company&#039;s advance was treated as made for his individual benefit and was assessable as dividend in his hands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>