<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (3) TMI 37 - ORISSA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38794</link>
    <description>Interest on delayed contractual dues is taxable only where it arises under a statute or a contract. Where no such legal source exists and the amount is merely labelled as interest but in substance compensates the claimant for being kept out of money due, it is treated as compensation or an ex gratia payment rather than income. On the facts noted, the arbitral award was characterised as compensatory, so the amount was held not to be a revenue receipt or taxable income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 11:04:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (3) TMI 37 - ORISSA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38794</link>
      <description>Interest on delayed contractual dues is taxable only where it arises under a statute or a contract. Where no such legal source exists and the amount is merely labelled as interest but in substance compensates the claimant for being kept out of money due, it is treated as compensation or an ex gratia payment rather than income. On the facts noted, the arbitral award was characterised as compensatory, so the amount was held not to be a revenue receipt or taxable income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>