<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (11) TMI 54 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38783</link>
    <description>Income derived from unauthorised occupation of Government poramboke land was held not taxable as agricultural income under the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1955. The charging provision applied only to the agricultural income of a &quot;person&quot;, and the Act linked that term to lawful ownership or holding of property. &quot;To hold&quot; was confined to possession and enjoyment in a lawful capacity such as owner, tenant, mortgagee in possession, or maintenance holder. A trespasser in unauthorised occupation did not satisfy that definition, so the income fell outside the Act&#039;s tax net and the Tribunal&#039;s finding was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 10:39:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (11) TMI 54 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38783</link>
      <description>Income derived from unauthorised occupation of Government poramboke land was held not taxable as agricultural income under the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1955. The charging provision applied only to the agricultural income of a &quot;person&quot;, and the Act linked that term to lawful ownership or holding of property. &quot;To hold&quot; was confined to possession and enjoyment in a lawful capacity such as owner, tenant, mortgagee in possession, or maintenance holder. A trespasser in unauthorised occupation did not satisfy that definition, so the income fell outside the Act&#039;s tax net and the Tribunal&#039;s finding was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>