<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (3) TMI 22 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38771</link>
    <description>Benami properties standing in the deceased&#039;s wife&#039;s name were treated as belonging beneficially to the deceased, because a benamidar holds only nominal title while real ownership remains with the person who provided the consideration; they were therefore includible in the principal value of the estate under the Estate Duty Act. By contrast, the addition for goodwill of the rice-mill business could not stand, because the Tribunal had found that no goodwill existed and the reference did not permit reopening that finding. The estate-duty inclusion was upheld for the benami assets, but the goodwill adjustment was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 10:12:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (3) TMI 22 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38771</link>
      <description>Benami properties standing in the deceased&#039;s wife&#039;s name were treated as belonging beneficially to the deceased, because a benamidar holds only nominal title while real ownership remains with the person who provided the consideration; they were therefore includible in the principal value of the estate under the Estate Duty Act. By contrast, the addition for goodwill of the rice-mill business could not stand, because the Tribunal had found that no goodwill existed and the reference did not permit reopening that finding. The estate-duty inclusion was upheld for the benami assets, but the goodwill adjustment was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>