https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760082 The Bombay HC granted bail to an applicant in a money laundering case based on prolonged incarceration under Section 436A CrPC. The applicant was arrested in scheduled offences on 24th February 2020 and in the PMLA case on 5th March 2021, remaining incarcerated for approximately 4 years 8 months total. The court relied on Vijay Madanlal Choudhary v. Union of India, holding that Section 436A CrPC prevails over Section 45 PMLA's twin conditions when Article 21 violations occur. Since the applicant served over half the maximum punishment prescribed under Section 4 PMLA, the court allowed bail with conditions despite PMLA's stringent provisions. en-us Mon, 14 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Oct 2024 15:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760082 The Bombay HC granted bail to an applicant in a money laundering case based on prolonged incarceration under Section 436A CrPC. The applicant was arrested in scheduled offences on 24th February 2020 and in the PMLA case on 5th March 2021, remaining incarcerated for approximately 4 years 8 months total. The court relied on Vijay Madanlal Choudhary v. Union of India, holding that Section 436A CrPC prevails over Section 45 PMLA's twin conditions when Article 21 violations occur. Since the applicant served over half the maximum punishment prescribed under Section 4 PMLA, the court allowed bail with conditions despite PMLA's stringent provisions. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 14 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760082