<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 716 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760117</link>
    <description>HC reviewed a case challenging an administrative order for violating natural justice. The court found procedural irregularities in the notice and order issuance. Granting relief, HC directed the petitioner to file a comprehensive reply within two weeks upon paying Rs. 50,000 costs. The 4th respondent was instructed to dispose of the show cause notice expeditiously after considering the reply, ensuring fair hearing principles were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 16:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 716 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760117</link>
      <description>HC reviewed a case challenging an administrative order for violating natural justice. The court found procedural irregularities in the notice and order issuance. Granting relief, HC directed the petitioner to file a comprehensive reply within two weeks upon paying Rs. 50,000 costs. The 4th respondent was instructed to dispose of the show cause notice expeditiously after considering the reply, ensuring fair hearing principles were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>