<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2859 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458217</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC dismissed the appeal against the ITAT&#039;s order for AY 2007-08, affirming that Section 50C of the Income Tax Act is inapplicable to the transfer of tenancy rights. The dismissal was based on the absence of any substantial question of law, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s reliance on precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 20:00:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2859 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458217</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC dismissed the appeal against the ITAT&#039;s order for AY 2007-08, affirming that Section 50C of the Income Tax Act is inapplicable to the transfer of tenancy rights. The dismissal was based on the absence of any substantial question of law, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s reliance on precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>