<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (6) TMI 6 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38746</link>
    <description>A Hindu undivided family may include a widow as a member even though she is not a coparcener, and on the facts the assessee, his widowed mother, wife and son constituted a joint family. Income from the joint business and house property was therefore assessable in the hands of the family, but the widow&#039;s defined half share in the house-property income had to be excluded under section 9(3) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 because her interest was definite and ascertainable under section 3(1) of the Hindu Women&#039;s Rights to Property Act, 1937. The reassessment was also sustainable under section 34(1)(b) where the jurisdictional conditions for that clause were satisfied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:16:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (6) TMI 6 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38746</link>
      <description>A Hindu undivided family may include a widow as a member even though she is not a coparcener, and on the facts the assessee, his widowed mother, wife and son constituted a joint family. Income from the joint business and house property was therefore assessable in the hands of the family, but the widow&#039;s defined half share in the house-property income had to be excluded under section 9(3) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 because her interest was definite and ascertainable under section 3(1) of the Hindu Women&#039;s Rights to Property Act, 1937. The reassessment was also sustainable under section 34(1)(b) where the jurisdictional conditions for that clause were satisfied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>