https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82240 The impugned order violated principles of natural justice by failing to provide an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner, despite a written request, contravening Section 75(4) of the MGST Act. The order was made without adhering to the statutory requirement of granting a hearing where an adverse decision is contemplated against the person chargeable with tax or penalty. Coordinate Benches in similar cases have set aside orders that disregarded Section 75(4)'s mandate of hearing the petitioners. Consequently, the impugned order dated 17 January 2024 and the subsequent recovery notice dated 6 September 2024 were quashed, and the petition was disposed of. en-us Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:39:03 +0530 Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:39:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82240 The impugned order violated principles of natural justice by failing to provide an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner, despite a written request, contravening Section 75(4) of the MGST Act. The order was made without adhering to the statutory requirement of granting a hearing where an adverse decision is contemplated against the person chargeable with tax or penalty. Coordinate Benches in similar cases have set aside orders that disregarded Section 75(4)'s mandate of hearing the petitioners. Consequently, the impugned order dated 17 January 2024 and the subsequent recovery notice dated 6 September 2024 were quashed, and the petition was disposed of. Highlights GST Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:39:03 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82240