<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (8) TMI 37 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38741</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessees. It found that the department failed to prove inaccuracies in the construction costs and highlighted the incomplete status of the building, impacting valuation. The court agreed that the penalty imposition was unjustified due to the lack of evidence against the assessees&#039; construction account. Consequently, the petitions were dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision and rejecting the Commissioner of Wealth-tax&#039;s questions of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:02:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (8) TMI 37 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38741</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessees. It found that the department failed to prove inaccuracies in the construction costs and highlighted the incomplete status of the building, impacting valuation. The court agreed that the penalty imposition was unjustified due to the lack of evidence against the assessees&#039; construction account. Consequently, the petitions were dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision and rejecting the Commissioner of Wealth-tax&#039;s questions of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>