<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 629 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760030</link>
    <description>NCLAT Principal Bench dismissed an application for condonation of 10-day delay in filing appeal. The impugned order was pronounced on 02.03.2022 in appellant&#039;s presence, making limitation period commence from that date per SC precedent in V. Nagarajan case. Appellant&#039;s claim that limitation should run from 14.03.2022 upload date was rejected. Appellant&#039;s subsequent story about certified copy being sent to wrong address and misplaced was deemed unbelievable as it was raised only in rejoinder, not original application. NCLAT found no sufficient cause for condonation of delay and dismissed the application without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 629 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760030</link>
      <description>NCLAT Principal Bench dismissed an application for condonation of 10-day delay in filing appeal. The impugned order was pronounced on 02.03.2022 in appellant&#039;s presence, making limitation period commence from that date per SC precedent in V. Nagarajan case. Appellant&#039;s claim that limitation should run from 14.03.2022 upload date was rejected. Appellant&#039;s subsequent story about certified copy being sent to wrong address and misplaced was deemed unbelievable as it was raised only in rejoinder, not original application. NCLAT found no sufficient cause for condonation of delay and dismissed the application without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>