<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 630 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760031</link>
    <description>Where a corporate insolvency resolution process claim has already been substantially admitted, appellate interference is unwarranted. The Resolution Professional confirmed final admission of the principal amount, admission of interest for voting-share calculation under Regulation 16A(7) of the CIRP Regulations, and partial admission of the salary-related claim on the basis of available documents. In light of that recorded admission, there was no basis to disturb the claim-admission order, and the challenge was rejected. The appeal did not lead to any further enlargement of the claim already recognised in the insolvency process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:36:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 630 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760031</link>
      <description>Where a corporate insolvency resolution process claim has already been substantially admitted, appellate interference is unwarranted. The Resolution Professional confirmed final admission of the principal amount, admission of interest for voting-share calculation under Regulation 16A(7) of the CIRP Regulations, and partial admission of the salary-related claim on the basis of available documents. In light of that recorded admission, there was no basis to disturb the claim-admission order, and the challenge was rejected. The appeal did not lead to any further enlargement of the claim already recognised in the insolvency process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>