https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760035 CESTAT Allahabad dismissed revenue's appeal as not maintainable due to monetary limits, where the amount involved was below the threshold permitted for revenue appeals before the Tribunal. The case involved seizure of gold from passenger's personal baggage. Despite HC's Article 226 direction dated 08.08.2019, no objection regarding maintainability was raised by revenue before HC or CESTAT. The revenue's earlier dismissal on 28.06.2019 was not disclosed to HC. However, HC's subsequent order dated 29.03.2023 specifically permitted all objections in remand proceedings, leading to appeal's dismissal for non-maintainability. en-us Wed, 10 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:39:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760035 CESTAT Allahabad dismissed revenue's appeal as not maintainable due to monetary limits, where the amount involved was below the threshold permitted for revenue appeals before the Tribunal. The case involved seizure of gold from passenger's personal baggage. Despite HC's Article 226 direction dated 08.08.2019, no objection regarding maintainability was raised by revenue before HC or CESTAT. The revenue's earlier dismissal on 28.06.2019 was not disclosed to HC. However, HC's subsequent order dated 29.03.2023 specifically permitted all objections in remand proceedings, leading to appeal's dismissal for non-maintainability. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 10 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760035