https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458199 A petition under Section 482 CrPC was not maintainable to challenge SARFAESI proceedings because the inherent criminal jurisdiction cannot be used against measures taken under that special statute. The taking of possession under Section 14 was treated as part of the continuation of proceedings under Section 13(4), and the Act itself provided an effective statutory remedy under Section 17 for an aggrieved person. Since the original Section 14 order had already attained finality and the challenge was directed only at a later refusal to keep it in abeyance, the High Court declined to entertain the petition and left the parties to pursue the remedy available under the Act. en-us Wed, 12 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Oct 2024 17:39:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458199 A petition under Section 482 CrPC was not maintainable to challenge SARFAESI proceedings because the inherent criminal jurisdiction cannot be used against measures taken under that special statute. The taking of possession under Section 14 was treated as part of the continuation of proceedings under Section 13(4), and the Act itself provided an effective statutory remedy under Section 17 for an aggrieved person. Since the original Section 14 order had already attained finality and the challenge was directed only at a later refusal to keep it in abeyance, the High Court declined to entertain the petition and left the parties to pursue the remedy available under the Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 12 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458199