https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458200 Where the underlying appeal before the DRAT had already been disposed of, a subsequent Section 340 CrPC application could not proceed without first resolving the tribunal's jurisdiction and maintainability. The Court held that the objection to maintainability was threshold and had to be examined before any further steps were taken. It did not quash the proceedings outright, but required the DRAT to decide the preliminary issue first, with all parties' rights and contentions reserved. en-us Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Oct 2024 15:47:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458200 Where the underlying appeal before the DRAT had already been disposed of, a subsequent Section 340 CrPC application could not proceed without first resolving the tribunal's jurisdiction and maintainability. The Court held that the objection to maintainability was threshold and had to be examined before any further steps were taken. It did not quash the proceedings outright, but required the DRAT to decide the preliminary issue first, with all parties' rights and contentions reserved. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458200