https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458204 The HC determined that the respondent was not entitled to have legal representation present during the recording of statements under Section 50 of the PMLA. The court emphasized that the recording was videographed and audiographed to prevent coercion. Consequently, the court stayed the impugned direction, allowing the petition, as the investigation was completed and the prosecution complaint filed. en-us Wed, 10 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Oct 2024 03:29:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458204 The HC determined that the respondent was not entitled to have legal representation present during the recording of statements under Section 50 of the PMLA. The court emphasized that the recording was videographed and audiographed to prevent coercion. Consequently, the court stayed the impugned direction, allowing the petition, as the investigation was completed and the prosecution complaint filed. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 10 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458204