<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1553 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458195</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 22,89,898/- for alleged bogus Long Term Capital Gain, emphasizing the necessity of incriminating material for additions under Section 153A. The Tribunal agreed that the addition lacked supporting evidence from the search, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the CIT (A)&#039;s stance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 18:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1553 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458195</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 22,89,898/- for alleged bogus Long Term Capital Gain, emphasizing the necessity of incriminating material for additions under Section 153A. The Tribunal agreed that the addition lacked supporting evidence from the search, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the CIT (A)&#039;s stance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>