https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458188 Disputed questions of fact as to whether the accused were partners of the firm and were responsible for its business could not be examined in proceedings under Section 482 CrPC to quash complaint proceedings under Section 138 NI Act. Where the complaint specifically alleged that the appellants were partners and in charge of, and responsible for, the conduct of the business, the proper course was to allow those issues to be tested at trial. The High Court was therefore justified in declining to interfere in inherent jurisdiction, and the challenge to the complaint proceedings failed. en-us Thu, 28 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Oct 2024 17:34:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458188 Disputed questions of fact as to whether the accused were partners of the firm and were responsible for its business could not be examined in proceedings under Section 482 CrPC to quash complaint proceedings under Section 138 NI Act. Where the complaint specifically alleged that the appellants were partners and in charge of, and responsible for, the conduct of the business, the proper course was to allow those issues to be tested at trial. The High Court was therefore justified in declining to interfere in inherent jurisdiction, and the challenge to the complaint proceedings failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458188