https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458185 The Commission concluded that the conditions imposed by the opposite party on Regional Stock Exchange (RSE) subsidiaries were justifiable for investor protection, given their unique structure and regulatory requirements. It determined there was no prima facie case of abuse of dominant position under section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. Consequently, the case was closed under section 26(2) of the Act, and the decision was communicated to the involved parties. en-us Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Oct 2024 11:56:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458185 The Commission concluded that the conditions imposed by the opposite party on Regional Stock Exchange (RSE) subsidiaries were justifiable for investor protection, given their unique structure and regulatory requirements. It determined there was no prima facie case of abuse of dominant position under section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. Consequently, the case was closed under section 26(2) of the Act, and the decision was communicated to the involved parties. Case-Laws Law of Competition Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458185