https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759964 The Bombay HC set aside the impugned order dismissing the Petitioner's Appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35(F) of the Central Excise Act. The Court reinstated the Appeal for reconsideration by the Commissioner (Appeals), granting the Petitioner three months to deposit 7.5% of the demanded tax. Non-compliance within this period would lead to dismissal of the Appeal. The decision, specific to the case's circumstances, was not to be treated as a precedent. The Rule was disposed of without any cost order, and parties were directed to act on an authenticated copy of the order. en-us Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Oct 2024 08:43:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759964 The Bombay HC set aside the impugned order dismissing the Petitioner's Appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35(F) of the Central Excise Act. The Court reinstated the Appeal for reconsideration by the Commissioner (Appeals), granting the Petitioner three months to deposit 7.5% of the demanded tax. Non-compliance within this period would lead to dismissal of the Appeal. The decision, specific to the case's circumstances, was not to be treated as a precedent. The Rule was disposed of without any cost order, and parties were directed to act on an authenticated copy of the order. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759964