<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 576 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759977</link>
    <description>CESTAT New Delhi upheld the revocation of appellant&#039;s customs broker licence, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposition. The appellant illegally used another broker&#039;s credentials to file a bill of entry for prohibited goods import, violating multiple CBLR regulations including failure to obtain proper authorization, not advising client compliance, providing incorrect information, withholding prohibition details, and improper record maintenance. The tribunal found this was intentional misconduct to facilitate prohibited goods clearance, not innocent oversight, rejecting proportionality arguments and dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 08:43:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 576 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759977</link>
      <description>CESTAT New Delhi upheld the revocation of appellant&#039;s customs broker licence, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposition. The appellant illegally used another broker&#039;s credentials to file a bill of entry for prohibited goods import, violating multiple CBLR regulations including failure to obtain proper authorization, not advising client compliance, providing incorrect information, withholding prohibition details, and improper record maintenance. The tribunal found this was intentional misconduct to facilitate prohibited goods clearance, not innocent oversight, rejecting proportionality arguments and dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>