<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 578 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759979</link>
    <description>Under the special customs broker licensing framework, the disciplinary and appellate scheme is a self-contained code, and the right of appeal exists only where the statute or regulations expressly confer it. The general appellate provision under the Customs Act could not be used by the licensing authority to challenge its own exoneration order, because the statutory remedy was intended for the aggrieved licensee, not the authority that issued the original decision. The appeal was therefore not maintainable and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Oct 2024 13:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 578 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759979</link>
      <description>Under the special customs broker licensing framework, the disciplinary and appellate scheme is a self-contained code, and the right of appeal exists only where the statute or regulations expressly confer it. The general appellate provision under the Customs Act could not be used by the licensing authority to challenge its own exoneration order, because the statutory remedy was intended for the aggrieved licensee, not the authority that issued the original decision. The appeal was therefore not maintainable and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>