<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 588 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759989</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai allowed the appeal and deleted the addition made under intimation order u/s 143(1). The assessing officer erroneously reduced sale consideration of short term capital gains instead of aggregate capital gains from business income during return processing, converting business loss into profit. CIT(A) failed to condone delay and adjudicate on merits. ITAT found the error apparent from return perusal, set aside CIT(A)&#039;s order, and allowed all grounds raised by appellant, deleting the contested addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 13:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 588 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759989</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai allowed the appeal and deleted the addition made under intimation order u/s 143(1). The assessing officer erroneously reduced sale consideration of short term capital gains instead of aggregate capital gains from business income during return processing, converting business loss into profit. CIT(A) failed to condone delay and adjudicate on merits. ITAT found the error apparent from return perusal, set aside CIT(A)&#039;s order, and allowed all grounds raised by appellant, deleting the contested addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>