<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 592 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759993</link>
    <description>The ITAT overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, accepting the assessee&#039;s explanation that cash deposits were business receipts under section 44AD of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found no evidence contradicting the business nature of the deposits and emphasized the importance of substantiating income sources in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 08:43:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 592 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759993</link>
      <description>The ITAT overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, accepting the assessee&#039;s explanation that cash deposits were business receipts under section 44AD of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found no evidence contradicting the business nature of the deposits and emphasized the importance of substantiating income sources in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>