<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 593 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759994</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, reducing the addition of unexplained investment under Sec. 69 from Rs. 67 Lacs to Rs. 10 Lacs. The Tribunal recognized the joint ownership of the property and accepted the substantiated contributions from family members, aligning with the precedent that statements during surveys are not binding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 593 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759994</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, reducing the addition of unexplained investment under Sec. 69 from Rs. 67 Lacs to Rs. 10 Lacs. The Tribunal recognized the joint ownership of the property and accepted the substantiated contributions from family members, aligning with the precedent that statements during surveys are not binding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=759994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>